For as long as I can remember, Galvestonians have moaned and groaned about the physical denigration of the island.
And that's a long time when you realize I opened my eyes for the first time at Galveston's St. Mary's Infirmary 70 years ago.
I've written about the Island's problems before. The most recent was in a piece that I wrote three years ago, "Carbuncles Harming the Island's Skin."
Critics say, Not enough middle-income housing, not enough good jobs, the perception of poor public schools, too much public housing and no industry. How dare UTMB threaten to diminish in size?
What to do?
The standard decision: Call in a study group from another part of the country to evaluate the city's strong and weak points. Let the study conclude what can be done to resolve the problems. (Have you ever noticed there's never a part of the study group's contract that says they will resolve the problems after they find them?)
"Two hundred thousand dollars, please."
A wag or two write letters to the editor, "Heck, anyone who lives here could have told them "that," and it wouldn't have cost taxpayers 200 grand."
For at least 100 years, the citizenry has had a welfare mentality; the very attitude that many accuse the city's disadvantaged of.
The common denominator, if there is one, is simple: We're not willing to work toward resolving the problems ourselves. We've always expected the wealthy islanders to take care of it. For years it was the Sealys, Kempners, Hutchings, Moodys and Maceos.
In the main, the Sealys, Hutchings and Maceos have moved on, but they were replaced by the Mitchells and the Fertittas. Hot dog, we were in luck!
And then as these problem solvers attempted to make Galveston better, what Islanders arrogantly demanded that they do, the problem solvers found themselves facing huge numbers of very vocal, critical ingrates.
That's welfare, alright. It's just not taking place in a federally subsidized housing project.
For more than 20 years I physically called on and traveled to visit the heads of companies who we felt could have done well in Galveston. I wanted so badly to make a difference, to solve the problem.
New York, Boston, Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, Miami, Savannah, Charleston, San Francisco, Denver. No one in my lifetime has gone more miles or worn out more shoes trying to bring businesses to the Island than I have.
There was no study. I went to their office, looked them in the eye and did my best to sell them on opening an office, a store, a new business in Galveston.
It became harder and harder for me to go. Harder and harder to smile, by then knowing that the chance of another rejection was great. I kept on.
In the 1980s I called in a favor. Lester Quick was the founder of one of the first discount securities brokerage firms in the U.S., Quick and Reilly. I asked my friend, who was Quick's best friend, if he could get him to look at Galveston if we paid his travel and lodging expenses?
My idea was that with Quick's influence and the massive capital raising facet of Quick and Reilly, he might put Galveston on the road toward success.
When Quick arrived, we boarded a helicopter and flew the island. We landed, and then he said, "I can't do anything to help you."
What he said was what, in my heart, I already knew. Corporations whose businesses do not require them to be attached in some fashion to the Gulf of Mexico will not consider locating here.
Here are the primary reasons: Galveston presents risks that other parts of the U.S. don't. Hurricanes, fluctuating population, antiquated infrastructure and expensive travel access are insurmountable obstacles. Quick's list went on and on.
So if Quick's analysis was correct, and nearly one hundred years of experience seems to quantify that it was, how does Galveston become the place Islanders wish it were?
Well, to start off, it has to make substantial progress without the help of outsiders.
First and foremost, it is necessary to provide hope as well as a structured avenue for the disadvantaged to no longer need to be poor wage earners. That's done through education.
While GISD was huffing and puffing about the benefits that would accrue to the city if it built a multi-million dollar sports complex, Galveston College president, Myles Shelton, had plans for acquiring a 4 acre tract of land with a 40,000 square foot industrial building.
He envisioned it becoming a place of classrooms and shops where students could learn trades - welding, air conditioning maintenance, plumbing, electrical - where those who walked into his doors with little hope, could walk out smiling, confident because they had acquired skills that are marketable, and they know they'll be rewarded with a lot more than minimum wage.
That's how you reduce crime, reduce the need for subsidized housing, increase citizens' - especially young people's - self-worth. That's how you raise the demand for middle-income housing, and cause builders to produce it.
Galveston Independent School District should follow Shelton's lead, and with the promise of integrating the two programs. If state and federal laws are in the way, get them changed.
Your personal goal as a citizen should be to back only programs that make Galveston a town that can support itself, a town that is so magnetic that others will want to be a part of it. You can do that.
It's counterproductive to blame city hall, the council, and whether or not the property taxes are too high. All will change as you and I articulate our expectations.
Rabidly support education programs for those who will not get a degree from a senior college.
Refuse to participate in thoughts and discussions that the Island will be made the place you want it to be if industry can be encouraged to move here, and if Tilman Fertitta will get busy and renovate the Flagship hotel.
That's both a lazy and ludicrous mentality.
Take a very broad step today. Send a $1,000 donation to the Galveston Historical Foundation. That will make you a lifetime member. And it will make you an important voice in the one organization that has done more to revive Galveston to a place of productivity than any company, governmental entity, or private investor has done.
That's not just my opinion. The evidence is empirical.
Finally, demand...not taking no for an answer...that the city's building codes and ordinances be strictly enforced. No excuses. No exceptions. No junk cars in yards, no substandard housing. Period.
Copyright 2010 - William S. Cherry
(Permission granted to reprint this if unedited and with proper credit given the author)

BILL CHERRY, REALTORS
DALLAS - PARK CITIES
OUR 45th YEAR
214 503-8563
WEB